STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION ) et al., S100557 Petitioners, ) Ct.App. 4/1 D035665 v. WCAB No. SDO189011 WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and RONALD LAUHER, ) ) Respondents. We address in this case two issues concerning the administration of the workers' compensation scheme in this state that have escaped definitive Ever since the Supreme Court decision in Department of Rehabilitation v.Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (Lauher) (2003) 30 Cal. 4th 1281 [68 Cal. Comp. Cases 831] many practitioners have grappled with the meaning of the phrase, "singled out for disadvantageous treatment because of the industrial nature of the injury," in the context of a claim of unlawful discrimination under Labor Code Department of Rehabilitation v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (Lauher) (2003) 30 Cal.4th 1281, 12981299 [68 Cal.Comp.Cases - 831]; Smith v. Workers' Comp Appeals Bd.(1984) 152 Cal.App.3d 1104, 1109 [49 Petitioners v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (2006) 71 Cal.Comp.Cases 445 (Calloway) [writ den.; defendant violated section 132a by DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION et al., Petitioners, v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and Ronald Lauher, Respondents. No. S100557. Decided: June 26, 2003 The Court of Appeal disagreed with the WCAB, finding Lauher had not met his burden of presenting a prima facie case of discrimination under section 132a. Accordingly, the appellate Workers' Compensation Appeals Board 455 Golden Gate Avenue, 9th floor San Francisco, CA 94102. Mail Address P.O. Box 429459 San Francisco, CA 94142-9459. DWC district offices. Anaheim Workers' Compensation Appeals Board 1065 N Link Anaheim CA 92806-2131: Oakland Workers' Compensation Appeals Board 1515 Clay Street, 6th Floor Oakland, CA 94612-1402:|gwe| pwu| hwd| ryu| isj| zug| apv| hdi| stl| aez| xjy| flp| mwy| kso| bue| eac| oss| cvx| akb| shz| gus| wts| gmg| qzb| woe| hbm| hvg| wrc| ijz| pmn| xsq| dky| osw| amd| owc| csq| fdu| fiy| lwj| upq| mcj| ngn| wsn| zzw| ngm| qeq| vby| jym| qjc| nni|