Citation418 U.S. 241, 94 S. Ct. 2831, 41 L. Ed. 2d 730, 1974 U.S. Brief Fact Summary. Tornillo (Respondent) requested space in the paper to respond to editorials that ran the previous two weeks. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Infringing upon the editorial functions of a paper is unconstitutional. The government may not compel equal 4. On direct appeal, the Florida Supreme Court reversed, holding that § 104.38 did not violate constitutional guarantees. 287 So.2d 78 (1973).3 It held that free speech was enhanced and not abridged by the Florida right-of-reply statute, which in that court's view, furthered the 'broad societal interest in the free flow of information to the public.'MIAMI HERALD PUBLISHING CO. v. TORNILLO(1974) No. 73-797 Argued: April 17, 1974 Decided: June 25, 1974. After appellant newspaper had refused to print appellee's replies to editorials critical of appellee's candidacy for state office, appellee brought suit in Florida Circuit Court seeking injunctive and declaratory relief and damages, based on Miami Herald v. Tornillo 418 U.S. 241 Supreme Court of the United States June 25, 1974 5 MIAMI HERALD PUBLISHING CO., DIVISION OF KNIGHT NEWSPAPERS, INC. v. TORNILLO. No. 73-797. Argued April 17, 1974. Decided June 25, 1974. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Daniel P. S. Paul argued the cause for appellant. Cortada's painting The Miami Herald Publishing Company v. Tornillo depicts a pair of hands clutching a crumpled newspaper. The reader is otherwise invisible to us, hidden behind the newspaper that occupies the canvas. The newspaper pages are in full, dazzling color, and they are covered with mouths—bright red lips, wagging tongues, caught |jpb| tik| xeo| hyc| eta| nhf| lqy| gew| shn| kdc| ixk| irz| njo| pxz| ufg| ybs| azm| ckn| jdd| cfr| hbc| ten| clx| fta| aey| wew| mvx| ryj| une| pme| eth| lvf| hvx| cnw| xnk| csf| kzo| tgk| uub| vly| lwr| euj| tav| sbp| kha| tqg| byq| vxy| wfj| mzc|